2708-9517
MLA Directory of Periodicals
REAO: East Asian Studies Journals
EBSCO Education
ProQuest
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
ROAD
BASE
Baidu Scholar
All IJCLT publications have been through rigorous peer review, and their quality have been assessed by independent peers within the field. IJCLT enforces “double blind” reviewing, in which the referees and the authors remain anonymous to each other. The handling editors conduct a preliminary review of all submitted manuscripts and only those that meet the minimum criteria will be passed on to at least two expert referees for formal reviewing.
Whenever possible, referees are matched to the manuscript according to their expertise. Referees are asked to provide an assessment of the various aspects of a manuscript:
The handling editors then make a decision based on the reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities:
The time required for the review process depends on the response of the referees. The typical time for the first round of the refereeing process is approximately 4-6 weeks, with a maximum of three months.
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with the recommendations made by the referees.